Schedule I to Schedule III: What Actually Happened at the White House

On December 18, 2025, President Donald Trump formally signed an Executive Order directing the federal government to complete the rescheduling of federally controlled flower from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act.

The signing was deliberately staged as a medical and research event, not a political rally—Trump was flanked by cancer physicians, VA advocates, NIH leadership, FDA officials, CMS leadership, and representatives of the American Legion.

This was not framed as legalization. It was framed as federal recognition of medical legitimacy and a correction of decades of research paralysis.

“This Is Not Legalization”

Trump emphasized repeatedly that the order:

  • Does not legalize recreational use

  • Does not sanction adult-use consumption

  • Does not change federal prohibitions on unregulated or illicit products

He explicitly compared Schedule III substances to prescription painkillers—tools that can relieve suffering when used under medical supervision, and destroy lives when abused.

Why the Room Mattered More Than the Speech

This signing mattered less because of Trump’s rhetoric—and more because of who stood behind him.

Among those speaking or formally introduced:

  • CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz

  • FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary

  • NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

  • NIDA Director Dr. Nora Volkow

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute physicians

  • Duke University medical researchers

  • American Legion leadership representing veterans

This was a medical coalition, not an industry event.

Several physicians openly acknowledged something rarely said on a White House stage:

“Medical schools do not meaningfully teach cannabinoid science, despite decades of patient-reported benefit.”

Veterans, Pain, and Opioid Substitution

One of the most consistent themes—especially from VA-aligned speakers—was the role of THC-dominant treatments as potential alternatives to narcotics, particularly for:

  • Chronic pain

  • PTSD

  • Traumatic brain injury

  • Cancer-related symptom management

Veterans’ advocates framed rescheduling as a research unlock, not a treatment mandate:

  • It allows proper trials

  • It allows dosage standards

  • It allows long-term outcome tracking

  • It allows risk stratification for vulnerable populations

The suicide crisis among veterans was repeatedly referenced as context—not as a claim, but as a reason research must finally be allowed to proceed.

CMS Announcement: CBD Access for Seniors

The most concrete policy shift announced beyond rescheduling came from CMS.

CMS confirmed the launch of a new Innovation Center model that will:

  • Allow Medicare beneficiaries access to hemp-derived CBD products

  • Begin as early as Q2 2026

  • Require physician recommendation

  • Impose quality, sourcing, and safety standards

  • Provide up to $500 annually in eligible products per patient

  • Collect real-world outcomes data for public analysis

This is the first federally backed outcomes study of CBD use at scale in seniors and veterans.

CMS leadership was explicit:

These products are already being used. The problem is that patients and doctors have had no guidance, no standards, and no data.

Why Schedule III Changes Everything for Research

Multiple speakers—especially cancer researchers—highlighted three structural changes enabled by Schedule III:

  1. Democratization of Research: Research will no longer be limited to a handful of federally approved institutions.

  2. Access to Reliable Material: Researchers will no longer be forced to rely on low-quality, government-supplied material disconnected from real-world products.

  3. Scale: Trials can now be conducted at meaningful scale—hundreds or thousands of patients, not dozens.

One physician described the shift plainly:

“You cannot run gold-standard trials on a substance that is federally illegal. This fixes that.”

Risks Were Not Ignored

Notably, NIDA leadership directly addressed risks, including:

  • Addiction potential

  • Adolescent exposure

  • Psychosis risk in vulnerable populations

The framing was not denial—it was evidence-based containment:

We cannot protect people by refusing to study something they are already using.

Bottom Line

This executive order does three real things:

  1. Formally acknowledges medical legitimacy at the federal level

  2. Removes the single biggest barrier to high-quality research

  3. Creates the first federal outcomes pathway for CBD in seniors and veterans

It does not:

  • Legalize adult use

  • Create interstate commerce

  • Eliminate federal control

  • Interupt Current State Programs

This was not a culture-war moment.
It was a course correction—late, imperfect, but unavoidable.

And for the first time, it was said out loud, on record, by doctors standing in the White House:

“We should have been studying this decades ago.”

…We have been dumb*ss…

Previous
Previous

“Cash, Card, Or Kidney”: Everything you need to know about Cashless ATMs

Next
Next

Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump is Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research